The man who made empty companies look profitable enough to live in Singapore
Wang Junjie ran nine companies from a Housing Board flat in Bedok. On June 3, 2026, he pleaded guilty to helping make laundered money look like a Singapore business so a Cypriot national could apply for permanent residency.
Mei read the headline at 7:42 on a Wednesday morning, sitting on the MRT going to a job she had held for nineteen years. Compliance officer at a bank in the central business district. Fifty-eight years old. Two grown children. A small balcony garden of basil and curry leaves she watered before she left the flat.
The name in the article was not famous. Wang Junjie. Forty-three. A corporate service provider who lived in an HDB flat in Bedok and ran something called LW Business Consultancy. He had pleaded guilty the day before to conspiring to cheat IRAS, the tax authority. He had been the company secretary for nine firms tied to the largest money laundering case Singapore had ever prosecuted.
Mei knew the name. She did not know him. She knew the name because three years earlier, a file had crossed her desk with that signature on it. Director listed as a foreign national. Company secretary listed as Wang Junjie of LW Business Consultancy. The file had everything it was supposed to have. A registered address. A business activity code. Tax filings showing revenue and gross profit. She had ticked the box. The account had opened.
The MRT slowed into Raffles Place. She put her phone in her bag.
There is a story Singapore tells about itself. The clean jurisdiction. The rule of law. The place where the paperwork is real and the regulators answer their email. For forty years the city sold that story to bankers and family offices and high-net-worth individuals who wanted a passport in a place that was not on anyone's grey list.
The story was not a lie. It was a costume.
The August 15, 2023 raid was the moment the costume slipped. Police hit multiple addresses across the island before dawn. They seized gold bars. Bentleys. Watches in display cases. Property deeds for Good Class Bungalows. Cash in safes. The number that emerged in the weeks after was S$3 billion (about $2.2B USD) in assets connected to ten foreign nationals, mostly Chinese-born, holding passports from Cambodia, Cyprus, Vanuatu, Turkey, and the Dominican Republic.
The money came from two places, according to court documents. Illegal online gambling operations run out of the Philippines. Unlicensed money lending in China. Both businesses generate cash. Cash needs to become something else. That is the only law of dirty money. It cannot stay what it is.
So it became Singapore companies.
This is where Wang Junjie sat. Not in the Good Class Bungalows. Not on the yachts. In a Housing Board flat in Bedok, at a desk, with a laptop and a folder of corporate seals. He was the gatekeeper. A corporate service provider is the person who incorporates the company, files the annual returns, handles the secretarial work, signs the documents that say the company exists and operates and pays its taxes.
The gate is supposed to be a gate. This one was a turnstile.
According to the charges Wang admitted to on June 3, he made false representations to IRAS about the revenue, gross profits, and trade receivables of Xinbao Investment Holdings for financial years 2019, 2020, and 2021. Xinbao was a company whose director was Su Baolin, a Cambodian national. Wang also helped create the appearance that Yihao Cyber Technologies was a profitable Singapore business when it had no legitimate business activity in Singapore at all. Yihao's director was Su Haijin, a Cypriot national.
Read that slowly. The company had no business. The tax return said it did. The tax return was the business.
Why bother lying to the tax man when you are already a money launderer? Because the lie was the product. Su Haijin was applying for Singapore permanent residency. A PR application requires evidence of substantial economic contribution. A profitable Singapore company that pays taxes is exactly that evidence. The fraudulent tax filing was not a side crime. It was the whole point. Wang was not hiding the money from IRAS. He was using IRAS to authenticate it.
That is the machine. Dirty money goes in one end. A Singapore tax return comes out the other. The tax return becomes the residency application. The residency application becomes the passport. The passport becomes the bank account at the institution where Mei works.
Su Baolin was sentenced on April 29, 2024 to fourteen months in jail. He forfeited S$65 million (about $48M USD), which was ninety percent of the S$72 million in assets the state had seized from him. Su Haijin received the same sentence and forfeited S$170 million (about $125M USD). On June 1, 2024, both men were deported to Cambodia. They served their time. They left.
Wang stayed. He is the local. He is the one who held the pen.
Mei got off the train and walked the three blocks to her building. The June heat was already heavy. She thought about the file from three years ago. She thought about the tick mark she had put in the box. She thought about how the system was designed to trust the paperwork because if you could not trust the paperwork, the whole jurisdiction stopped working.
The Financial Action Task Force published its assessment of Singapore on May 6, 2026. It praised the asset recovery. It said the fines on financial institutions had been "too low." S$27.45 million (about $20M USD) spread across nine financial institutions, imposed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore in July 2025, against a case worth three billion. The math is the verdict.
Eighteen individuals at those institutions were also subject to MAS action. Six single-family office funds had their tax incentives withdrawn. The Anti-Money Laundering and Other Matters Act 2024 was passed to give law enforcement more tools. The system was responding. The system is still responding.
But the gate had been a turnstile for years before anyone noticed. And the man who ran the turnstile was not a master criminal. He was a corporate secretary with a laptop in Bedok.
That is the part that should not be missed. The S$3 billion did not need a genius. It needed a service provider. The most dangerous figure in a laundering case is rarely the man with the watches. It is the man who knows which form to file.
Wang's sentencing submissions are scheduled for July 16, 2026. He faces years in prison. The companies he serviced have been wound up. The directors have been deported. The money has been forfeited. The story, from the outside, looks closed.
It is not closed. There are other Wangs. There are other Bedok flats. There are other foreign nationals who need a Singapore company to look profitable for a residency application that the city, until very recently, was speeding up for high-net-worth individuals. On May 25, 2026, Singapore announced plans to shorten the time it takes for such individuals to open private banking accounts. A wealth push. The phrase the government used.
Mei sat down at her desk. She opened her email. She opened the compliance dashboard. She thought about the next file. She thought about the tick mark.
The costume had slipped. It had not come off.
She started reading.
- The Straits Times | June 3, 2026 | "Bedok resident behind 9 firms tied to $3b money laundering case admits to conspiring to cheat IRAS"
- Singapore Police Force | August 15, 2023 | Press statements on island-wide anti-money laundering operation
- State Courts of Singapore | April 29, 2024 | Sentencing of Su Baolin and Su Haijin
- Monetary Authority of Singapore | July 2025 | Enforcement action against nine financial institutions, S$27.45M penalty
- Financial Action Task Force | May 6, 2026 | Mutual Evaluation Report on Singapore
- Parliament of Singapore | 2024 | Anti-Money Laundering and Other Matters Act 2024
- Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore | Financial Years 2019-2021 | Tax filings for Xinbao Investment Holdings (referenced in charging documents)
Editorial Notice
MarkTell is a true crime publication about financial fraud. Some scenes, dialogue, and sequential details are reconstructed from court filings, enforcement actions, news reports, and public records. Where the public record does not provide exact details, editorial reconstruction is used to convey the documented pattern of events. Names of private individuals may be changed to protect identity. All factual claims are sourced to public documents cited in the Evidence Trail above. MarkTell does not provide investment, legal, or financial advice. Nothing published here constitutes a recommendation to buy, sell, or avoid any investment. Allegations described in active cases have not been adjudicated and defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty. Readers should conduct their own due diligence before making financial decisions.