The CFO had sole access to the password. For eleven years, that was the whole machine.
William Smith spent eleven years draining a Detroit non-profit while signing off on the books himself. On Wednesday, a federal appeals court told him the 19-year sentence stands.
Denise stood at the chain-link fence on Atwater Street in May of 2024 with a paper cup of coffee going cold in her hand. She was 58. She walked this stretch most Saturdays because her husband used to. He had been gone four years. The forty dollars she gave every month to the Detroit Riverfront Conservancy was, in a way she did not say out loud, for him.
The fence was new. Behind it, the riverwalk stopped. There was supposed to be more by now. She had read the email newsletters. She had seen the renderings. The renderings did not match what she was looking at.
She did not know yet that a man named William A. Smith had been fired the same month. She did not know that the FBI had been inside the books. She did not know that the reason the path was not finished was that the money to finish it had been spent on a Maserati for someone none of the donors had ever met.
She would learn. The donors all would.
II. THE PASSWORD
Here is the whole machine in one sentence. One man had the username and the password to the operating account of a non-profit that handled tens of millions of dollars, and nobody else looked.
That is it. That is the entire architecture.
William A. Smith, 53, was the Chief Financial Officer of the Detroit Riverfront Conservancy from 2011 until his termination in May 2024. According to the Justice Department, Smith had sole access and control over the Conservancy's bank accounts. He held the password to the online business checking portal. He prepared the documents that went to the outside accountant. He doctored those documents before they left his desk.
A non-profit is supposed to have two sets of eyes on the money. A board. An audit committee. An outside firm that catches what insiders miss. The Conservancy had all of those things on paper. In practice, the eyes were closed. For eleven years, the eyes were closed.
Read that slowly. Eleven years.
III. WHAT THE MONEY BOUGHT
Federal prosecutors laid out the spending. The Conservancy funds went into a company Smith owned called The Joseph Group, Inc. From there, the money went out into a life.
Approximately $14.9 million paid down a single American Express account.
A 35-foot boat.
A leased Mercedes-Benz at a sticker around $200,000.
A Maserati, prosecutors said, purchased for a romantic interest who also received roughly $3.7 million in transfers.
A yacht chartered for a Mediterranean cruise.
A private jet to Las Vegas.
A $29,000 private suite at a Detroit Lions game.
Picture that suite. Picture the people in it. Picture the catering. Picture the view of the field. Now picture Denise at the fence.
The total, according to court documents, was $44.3 million stolen between November 2012 and May 2024.
IV. THE ACCOUNTANT'S COPY
The concealment was not exotic. It did not require a shell network in the Caymans. It did not require a cryptocurrency mixer. It required a printer and a willingness to lie on paper.
Smith doctored the bank statements he handed to the Conservancy's accountant. That is what the DOJ filings describe. The accountant audited what Smith handed over. What Smith handed over was not what the bank actually said.
This is the part that should make every donor in America sit down. The outside auditor was looking at a document the CFO had altered before it left his hands. There was no independent path from the bank to the auditor that bypassed Smith. The lock and the key were in the same pocket.
The Conservancy says it has since cut the size of its board and added internal controls. The auditing firm has been replaced. Then-CEO Mark Wallace resigned. None of that brings back eleven years.
V. THE FENCE, AGAIN
Denise found out the way most donors found out. Local news. A press conference. A guilty plea announced in November 2024. The number on the screen was bigger than she could hold in her head.
She did the small math anyway. Forty dollars a month for nine years. About $4,300. She thought about that against the $29,000 suite at Ford Field and her face went hot in a way that did not have a name.
The riverwalk delay was real. The Conservancy itself put it on the record. Smith's theft, the organization said, forced the delay of portions of the project. The thing Denise's late husband used to walk was unfinished because someone else needed a yacht.
VI. WEDNESDAY
On Wednesday, June 18, 2026, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied William Smith's appeal of his 19-year sentence. His attorney had argued the sentence was arbitrary and that two sentencing enhancements, one for sophisticated means and one for sophisticated laundering, should not have been applied.
The court did not get to the merits of those arguments. It did not have to. In his plea agreement, Smith had waived the right to appeal on those grounds. He signed the waiver in November 2024. The court read the waiver and closed the door.
His earliest release date is June 2041. The restitution order is approximately $48 million. He does not have $48 million. He spent it.
CEO Ryan Sullivan said the Conservancy supported the court's decision. Acting U.S. Attorney Julie A. Beck had said at sentencing that Smith stole an astonishing amount of money from an important community institution to fund an extravagant lifestyle. The word she used was astonishing. The number was astonishing. The mechanism was not.
VII. THE MACHINE WAS A PASSWORD
Here is what the case is, stripped of the yacht and the Maserati and the suite. It is a story about one person holding one login for too long. It is a story about a board that trusted a CFO the way Denise trusted the Conservancy. It is a story about an outside auditor who looked at a document and did not check the document against the source.
Smith did not need to be a genius. He needed to be the only one with the key. He was the only one with the key for eleven years.
Non-profits across the country are reading this case now. The Association of Certified Fraud Examiners would tell you the average non-profit embezzlement runs in the six-figure to low-seven-figure range. This one ran to $44.3 million because nobody opened the door for over a decade.
Denise still walks the riverfront. The fence is gone in some places. New sections have opened. She still gives her forty dollars a month, though she pauses now before she clicks confirm. She told a friend she does not want the man who stole from her to also steal the thing her husband loved.
That is the part that may be the saddest. The donors had to choose, after the fact, whether to keep believing in the thing the thief almost broke.
He stole the money. He almost stole the walk.
- ClickOnDetroit / WDIV Local 4 | June 18, 2026 | Court denies ex-Detroit Riverfront Conservancy CFO's appeal in $40M embezzlement case
- U.S. Department of Justice, Eastern District of Michigan | April 2025 | Sentencing materials, United States v. William A. Smith
- U.S. Department of Justice | November 2024 | Plea agreement, United States v. William A. Smith
- U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit | June 18, 2026 | Order denying appeal
- Detroit Riverfront Conservancy | 2024-2025 | Public statements regarding Smith termination, riverwalk delay, and governance reforms
- Statement of Acting U.S. Attorney Julie A. Beck, Eastern District of Michigan | April 2025
Editorial Notice
MarkTell is a true crime publication about financial fraud. Some scenes, dialogue, and sequential details are reconstructed from court filings, enforcement actions, news reports, and public records. Where the public record does not provide exact details, editorial reconstruction is used to convey the documented pattern of events. Names of private individuals may be changed to protect identity. All factual claims are sourced to public documents cited in the Evidence Trail above. MarkTell does not provide investment, legal, or financial advice. Nothing published here constitutes a recommendation to buy, sell, or avoid any investment. Allegations described in active cases have not been adjudicated and defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty. Readers should conduct their own due diligence before making financial decisions.