← Back to Feed

The Cash Flow King borrowed the same house from sixty-three different people.

Matthew Motil built a brand before he built a fraud. The brand was a podcast, a book, and a nickname. The fraud was a stack of mortgages on houses he kept selling to people who never met each other.

The Cash Flow King borrowed the same house from sixty-three different people.

Denise signed the note at her kitchen table on a Tuesday night in 2019. She was fifty-eight. She had been a dental hygienist in Parma for thirty-one years and her right knee had started telling her it was tired before her shifts ended. She wanted one more income stream. Something passive. Something that did not require her to stand on tile under fluorescent lights for eight hours.

The pen was a freebie from a Cleveland Clinic health fair. The note was printed on regular paper, the kind you buy at Office Depot in a five-hundred-sheet ream. The note said her loan was secured by a first-position mortgage on a duplex in Lakewood. Gray vinyl siding. Two units. She had seen the photo in the pitch deck.

She wrote the check for $50,000. That was most of what her mother had left her.

She had heard the man on a podcast. He called himself the Cash Flow King. He had a book called Man on Fire. He talked about how regular people could buy mortgages the way rich people did, how the bank was just a middleman, how if you cut out the middleman you kept the spread. He sounded like someone who had read every book she had ever meant to read.

His name was Matthew Motil. He lived in North Olmsted. He had a real estate license and a microphone with a foam windscreen and a shelf behind him that always had his own book on it, face out.

I.

This is what Denise believed she was buying.

She believed she was the sole lienholder on a duplex in Lakewood. That if the borrower defaulted, she could foreclose. That her name was on a piece of paper at the Cuyahoga County recorder's office that said: this property, this debt, this woman.

She believed the interest payments she received every month came from the rent collected on that duplex.

She believed she had cut out the middleman.

II.

Here is what was actually happening, according to the federal record.

Between October 2017 and March 2022, Matthew Motil took in more than $7.3 million from at least 63 people. He sold them promissory notes. He told each of them the notes were secured by mortgages on specific houses in Northeast Ohio.

He used the same houses more than once.

One duplex. One pledge. Then another pledge on the same duplex to a different investor who did not know the first investor existed. Then another. The Department of Justice laid this out in the indictment and again at the plea hearing on September 5, 2024, when Motil pleaded guilty to securities fraud and wire fraud.

A promissory note is a written promise to pay. Plain English. A mortgage attached to that note is supposed to give you a claim on a specific piece of property if the borrower stops paying. Plain English too. The system only works if the lien is recorded and if there is one note per first-position lien. Motil's machine ran on the assumption that nobody would check.

Most people did not check. Why would they. The man had a podcast.

III.

The money Denise sent did not buy a mortgage. It paid the previous month's interest to investors who had signed earlier notes. That is the definition of a Ponzi scheme. Money in the front door, money out the back door, nothing in between except a man who knows the timing of both doors.

What the DOJ documented going out the back door was specific. A lease on a large home on the shore of Lake Erie. Courtside seats to Cleveland Cavaliers games. Money funneled into fitness businesses Motil ran on the side. Personal expenses that left a paper trail because there were too many of them to hide.

When investors asked about their mortgages, about why they had not seen the recorded document yet, Motil told them processing was slow. The county was backed up. The title company was behind. He was working on it.

The county was not backed up. The mortgage was never going to be recorded as represented. If it had been, the second investor on the same property would have seen the first investor's lien when their own paperwork was submitted, and the machine would have stopped.

IV.

Denise found out the way most of them found out. Somebody else found out first.

One investor, sometime in late 2021, decided to pull the public record on the property securing his note. The Cuyahoga County recorder lets you do this from your living room. You type in a parcel number. You see every lien filed against it. He saw his. He also saw two others he did not recognize.

He called one of the names on the other liens. That investor had also been told he was the sole lienholder. They called a third. By March 2022 the scheme was visible enough that the United States Secret Service Money Laundering Task Force and the Cuyahoga County Prosecutor's Office had it open.

Denise got a letter. She read it standing at her kitchen counter. She did not sit down because if she sat down she would not get back up for a while and her shift started at six.

V.

The structure here is not exotic. A licensed real estate agent built a brand. The brand bought him trust. The trust bought him deposits. He used the deposits to pay the previous deposits and kept the rest. The audit trail he left behind, the same property pledged to multiple investors in a county recorder's database anyone could search, was the kind of evidence that does not require a forensic accountant. You needed a parcel number and ten minutes.

That is what should disturb you. Not that he hid it well. That he did not need to hide it well.

The brand did the hiding for him.

Denise had listened to him for a year before she sent the money. By the time she signed the note, she did not think of him as a stranger. She thought of him as a man whose voice she knew. She had heard him talk about his wife. She had heard him talk about his goals. She had heard him quote books.

She had not heard him say: I pledge the same house to multiple people and use new money to pay old.

She would not have heard him say that. That was not in the format.

VI.

On July 18, 2025, U.S. District Court Judge Donald C. Nugent sentenced Matthew Motil to 70 months in federal prison. Five years and ten months. Followed by three years of supervised release. The restitution order came to $5,085,247.08.

The total taken was more than $7.3 million. Do the math. There is a gap of more than two million dollars between what 63 people gave him and what he was ordered to give back. Some of that is money already paid out as fake interest. Some of it is money the court could not recover because it had been spent on a lease, on basketball tickets, on a gym.

Restitution orders are not the same as restitution paid. They are a number on a piece of paper that the government will try to collect against future earnings of a man who is going to be in federal prison until 2031.

Denise is not going to see most of her fifty thousand dollars again. She knows this. She knew it before the sentencing.

VII.

The same machine has been running in Ohio under different names.

On April 10, 2026, a thirty-one-year-old social media finance influencer in Columbus named Tyler Bossetti was sentenced to 72 months in prison for a $20 million real estate Ponzi scheme. He used Facebook and YouTube. He promised returns of 30 percent or more. Investors lost more than $11 million.

On May 5, 2026, a multi-layered bribery and fraud conspiracy in East Cleveland involving the Al Zubair brothers and Michael Leon Smedley closed with $19,202,017.98 in joint restitution ordered.

On March 23, 2026, a builder named Jeffrey Crawford was sentenced for defrauding clients out of nearly $3 million on home construction loans.

In March 2026, the Ohio legislature introduced a bill requiring additional training for real estate agents, photo ID at transfers, and a 24-hour waiting period on property transactions, prompted by a near-theft of a property in Northeast Ohio.

Different houses. Different microphones. Same machine.

VIII.

Denise still works at the dental practice in Parma. The knee is worse. She does not listen to podcasts on the drive home anymore. She listens to the radio, which she had decided, somewhere in her thirties, was for old people. She has reclassified herself.

The check she wrote in 2019 was the most decisive thing she had ever done with her own money. That is what she keeps coming back to. Not that she lost it. That she had walked into the kitchen with a plan and signed the note and felt, for one evening, like a person who was finally ahead of her own life.

The man with the microphone took that night from her too. He took the house she never owned. He took the version of herself who, for a little while, thought she had figured it out.

The recorder's office in Cuyahoga County is open to the public. Anyone can search a parcel. The lien was always going to be visible. The brand was the only thing in the way.

Evidence Trail
  1. U.S. Department of Justice, Northern District of Ohio | September 5, 2024 | Plea announcement, United States v. Matthew Motil
  2. U.S. Department of Justice, Northern District of Ohio | July 18, 2025 | Sentencing announcement, United States v. Matthew Motil
  3. U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio | July 18, 2025 | Judgment, Judge Donald C. Nugent presiding
  4. Cleveland.com | May 2026 | Coverage of Cleveland-area real estate fraud cases
  5. U.S. Department of Justice, Southern District of Ohio | April 10, 2026 | Sentencing of Tyler Bossetti
  6. U.S. Department of Justice | May 5, 2026 | Sentencing of Al Zubair brothers and Michael Leon Smedley
  7. U.S. Department of Justice | March 23, 2026 | Sentencing of Jeffrey Crawford
  8. Ohio Legislature | March 2026 | Proposed real estate fraud prevention bill
— Mark Tell, Editor

Editorial Notice

MarkTell is a true crime publication about financial fraud. Some scenes, dialogue, and sequential details are reconstructed from court filings, enforcement actions, news reports, and public records. Where the public record does not provide exact details, editorial reconstruction is used to convey the documented pattern of events. Names of private individuals may be changed to protect identity. All factual claims are sourced to public documents cited in the Evidence Trail above. MarkTell does not provide investment, legal, or financial advice. Nothing published here constitutes a recommendation to buy, sell, or avoid any investment. Allegations described in active cases have not been adjudicated and defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty. Readers should conduct their own due diligence before making financial decisions.