← Back to Feed

The settlement check that never arrived, and the lawyer who cashed it instead

Tuan Anh Khuu spent five years diverting client settlement funds into his own accounts. The federal sentence came in July 2026. The Oklahoma City couple whose son died in a car accident is one of about twenty-two families who learned the money had a different destination than the one on the retainer agreement.

The settlement check that never arrived, and the lawyer who cashed it instead

Maria kept the retainer agreement in a folder on top of the refrigerator, next to her son's death certificate. She was fifty-four. She worked twelve-hour shifts as a home health aide on the north side of Oklahoma City. She had signed the retainer at a kitchen table with a pen the lawyer handed her, and she remembered thinking he had a soft voice, the kind of voice that did not push. That was September of 2018. Her son had been killed in a car accident that spring. The insurance company had a policy limit. The lawyer said he would handle it.

He handled it. In September 2018, according to the federal record, Tuan Anh Khuu negotiated a $55,000 settlement from the insurance company on behalf of an Oklahoma City couple whose son had died. The couple never received the money.

That is the case in one sentence. But the case is not one sentence. It is five years of one sentence, told twenty-two different times, to twenty-two different families, in strip-mall offices with signs that kept changing names. Law Offices of Tuan Khuu and Associates. Khuu and Associates. The Affordable Law Group. Global Law Group LLC. Same operator. Different letterhead.

On July 23, 2026, U.S. District Judge Timothy D. DeGiusti sentenced Khuu, 57, of Houston, to 41 months in federal prison and ordered restitution of $422,577.09. Khuu had pleaded guilty in August 2025 to nine counts of wire fraud. The indictment came down in September 2024. The conduct, according to prosecutors, ran from March 2015 through October 2020.

Read the timeline slowly. Five years and seven months. Twenty-two grievances. One number at the end.

I.

The mechanism is not complicated. It is boring. That is what makes it work.

A personal injury lawyer, or a wrongful death lawyer, or any lawyer who handles cases where a check comes in at the end, is supposed to maintain what is called a client trust account. That is the pot of money the lawyer holds on behalf of the client. When an insurance company or a defendant pays a settlement, the money goes into the trust account. The lawyer takes his contingency fee, which is the percentage he negotiated up front, usually a third. The rest goes to the client. That is the deal. That is what the retainer says on page one.

The trust account is not the lawyer's money. It is the client's money that the lawyer is holding. Touching it for anything other than the client is the thing you cannot do. It is the first thing they teach in the ethics course. It is the last thing they check before they let you into the bar.

According to the federal indictment, Khuu did not respect the wall between his money and his clients' money. He negotiated settlements. The checks came in. The money went to his business accounts. Then to his personal accounts. The clients kept calling. The clients kept getting told the check was on the way.

That is the whole machine. That is it.

II.

Picture Maria in the months after that September negotiation. She calls the office. The receptionist says the lawyer will call her back. He does not call her back. She calls again. The receptionist has a different name now. She drives to the office. The sign says something different than it did last time. She sits in a chair in a waiting room that smells like carpet cleaner and asks when she can talk to Mr. Khuu.

She is not stupid. She is grieving. Those are different things.

She is also not the first person in that waiting room. By the time the Oklahoma Bar Association began its investigation, roughly twenty-two former clients had filed grievances. Each one was a version of Maria. Each one had signed a retainer at a kitchen table or a folding chair in a strip mall. Each one had been told the check would come. Each one had been told to wait.

Waiting is the part the machine needs. Waiting is what buys the operator time to move the money. In a boiler room, the wait is the sixty days between the wire and the first missed dividend. In a timeshare, the wait is the cooling-off period that ends before the buyer reads the contract. In a settlement fraud, the wait is however long the client can be told the insurance company is slow.

The insurance company was not slow. The insurance company had paid.

III.

In October 2020, Khuu resigned from the Oklahoma Bar Association. The Oklahoma Supreme Court treated the resignation as disbarment. That is what happens when a lawyer under investigation for professional misconduct hands in the license before the license is taken away. The paperwork is different. The result is the same.

For four more years, no federal charges were filed. Grievances at the bar are not the same as a federal indictment. The bar can take your license. The bar cannot put you in prison. That takes the U.S. Attorney's office, and it takes time, and it takes an FBI agent working through bank records line by line.

In September 2024, the U.S. Attorney for the Western District of Oklahoma indicted Khuu on nine counts of wire fraud. In August 2025, he pleaded guilty. In July 2026, he was sentenced.

"The defendant's actions violated the professional, fiduciary, and trust responsibilities owed to his clients," U.S. Attorney Robert J. Troester said. FBI Special Agent in Charge Doug Goodwater said the sentence held Khuu accountable for exploiting client trust.

Both statements are true. Both statements are also the language people use after the fact. During the fact, the language was different. During the fact, the language was "the check is on the way."

IV.

The Oklahoma Bar Association maintains something called a Clients' Security Fund. It is money that active Oklahoma lawyers pay into every year, specifically to reimburse clients who have been stolen from by other Oklahoma lawyers. The fund exists because the profession knows this happens. Not often. But enough that they built a fund for it.

Read that again. The profession that regulates itself has a permanent line item for the money its members steal from clients.

Restitution ordered in a federal case is a piece of paper. Collection is a different problem. Federal defendants sentenced to 41 months do not typically have $422,577.09 sitting in an account waiting to be handed back. The Clients' Security Fund is what stands between the ordered amount and the amount the clients actually see.

Maria may or may not see her $55,000. If she sees it, she will see it because other lawyers she has never met paid into a fund created because lawyers she trusted stole from her.

V.

The saddest part is not the number. The saddest part is what the number was.

A $55,000 wrongful death settlement is not a lottery ticket. It is not a windfall. It is what the insurance industry has decided a young man's life is worth on paper in Oklahoma in 2018 after the actuaries have done their math. It is a check that arrives after the funeral, after the medical bills, after the calls to the county about the crash report. It is money that was never going to bring the son back. It was going to pay for the parts of losing him that require money.

The lawyer knew that. He negotiated it. He knew what the number was and where it came from and who was waiting for it.

He took it anyway.

Twenty-one other times, in different amounts, from different families, over five years and seven months, he took it anyway.

VI.

If you are reading this because someone you love hired a personal injury lawyer, or a wrongful death lawyer, or any lawyer who is going to handle a settlement check on their behalf, here are the ugly questions.

Not the exciting ones. Not the ones the lawyer wants you to ask. The ugly ones.

Ask where the trust account is held. Ask which bank. Ask for the account number the settlement will be deposited into, and ask whether it is a segregated trust account or an operating account. Ask when the settlement is expected to arrive, and then, on that date, call the insurance company directly and confirm the check was cut. Ask for a copy of the settlement statement, itemized, with the gross number, the fee, and the net to you. Read it. Ask your state bar association whether the lawyer has any open grievances. That information is often public.

None of this is rude. None of this is a lack of trust. All of this is what Maria wishes someone had told her to do at the kitchen table in September of 2018, before she picked up the borrowed pen.

The retainer she signed was a piece of paper. The lawyer she signed it with was a person. The trust account she was told her money would go into was, according to the record now settled in a federal courtroom in Oklahoma City, a door with nothing behind it.

He was not slow. He had already been paid.

Evidence Trail
  1. The Journal Record | July 28-29, 2026 | Former Oklahoma attorney sentenced for stealing over $420K from clients
  2. U.S. Attorney's Office, Western District of Oklahoma | July 23, 2026 | Sentencing announcement, United States v. Tuan Anh Khuu
  3. Federal indictment | September 2024 | Nine counts of wire fraud, W.D. Okla.
  4. Guilty plea | August 2025 | U.S. District Court, W.D. Okla.
  5. Oklahoma Supreme Court | October 2020 | Order accepting resignation of Tuan Anh Khuu, treated as disbarment
  6. Oklahoma Bar Association | Clients' Security Fund program materials, public disciplinary records

Editorial Notice

MarkTell is a true crime publication about financial fraud. Some scenes, dialogue, and sequential details are reconstructed from court filings, enforcement actions, news reports, and public records. Where the public record does not provide exact details, editorial reconstruction is used to convey the documented pattern of events. Names of private individuals may be changed to protect identity. All factual claims are sourced to public documents cited in the Evidence Trail above. MarkTell does not provide investment, legal, or financial advice. Nothing published here constitutes a recommendation to buy, sell, or avoid any investment. Allegations described in active cases have not been adjudicated and defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty. Readers should conduct their own due diligence before making financial decisions.