← Back to Feed

The promissory note said twelve percent. The receiver's ledger said something else.

A West Palm Beach company promised retirees real estate backed by a $450 million portfolio. Court records show most of the money never touched a building. This week, the sales agents started settling.

The promissory note said twelve percent. The receiver's ledger said something else.

Marlene signed at the kitchen table.

She was sixty-eight. She had worked the same elementary school in Port St. Lucie for thirty-one years, mostly in the nurse's office, mostly bandaging knees and calling mothers. She had a pension that was smaller than she had hoped for and an IRA she had built one paycheck at a time. The woman across the table from her had been introduced by a friend from church. The woman wore a navy blazer and called the document a promissory note. She said the note was collateralized by real estate. She said the company owned a portfolio worth four hundred and fifty million dollars in South Florida.

The pen was the sales agent's pen. The coffee was Marlene's.

She signed.

She wired $84,000 from her IRA custodian to a company called Wells Real Estate Investment, LLC, in West Palm Beach. She was promised twelve percent annual interest. The brochure mentioned, in a sentence she read twice, that at the end of three years the cumulative return could reach ninety-nine percent. She did not believe ninety-nine percent. She believed twelve. Twelve was enough.

The first interest payment cleared in the spring. She used part of it to buy her grandson a saxophone. He was eleven. He had been asking for a year.

The saxophone is still in the house.

I.

The company was real in the way that a company is real. It had an address in West Palm Beach. It had a CEO named Janalie C. Bingham. It had a program called the "Assets-to-Income Program." It had glossy one-pagers and a website and a portfolio number, $450 million, that appeared in the marketing the way a notarized seal appears on a document. The number was the proof. The proof was the number.

According to the SEC complaint filed on August 12, 2024, the number was a lie.

The complaint alleges that Wells raised at least $56 million from approximately 660 investors between January 2020 and 2024. Of that, the SEC alleges, only about $11 million was actually used to purchase real estate. Approximately $28 million was diverted into speculative options and futures trading, which lost at least $11.9 million. Approximately $6.9 million went to sales agents as undisclosed commissions. Approximately $10 million was paid out to earlier investors as "interest" and redemptions, which is the mechanical definition of a Ponzi scheme. About $1.8 million, the complaint alleges, was taken by Bingham and her husband Jean Joseph for personal expenses. Another $1.95 million in Wells-financed property was transferred into their own names.

Read the percentages.

Eleven million in real estate. Forty-five million in something else. That is not a real estate company with a problem. That is a different kind of company wearing real estate's clothes.

II.

The husband was the part nobody saw.

Jean Joseph was not on the website. He was not on the brochure. He was not, on paper, an officer of Wells Real Estate Investment, LLC. The SEC complaint calls him an "undisclosed control person." The complaint also alleges that he was a previously convicted financial fraud felon, and that he directed aspects of the scheme from prison during a prior sentence.

Picture that.

A man directing a Florida real estate fund from a federal facility, on phone calls and through letters, while a sales agent across the state sits in a navy blazer at a retired school nurse's kitchen table and explains the difference between a promissory note and a stock.

Marlene was not told about Jean Joseph. None of the 660 investors were.

That part may be the saddest. Not the trading losses. Not the commissions. The fact that the person operating the machine was a man whose name never appeared on any document she signed.

III.

The promissory note is the object that makes this case make sense.

A promissory note is a piece of paper. It says: I, the company, promise to pay you, the investor, this amount of money at this rate of interest by this date. That is all. It looks like a bond. It feels like a bond. To a retired school nurse who has spent thirty-one years filling out forms, a promissory note feels like a document with the seriousness of a mortgage or a deed.

The note in Marlene's hands said her money was collateralized by real estate. That phrase, collateralized by real estate, is doing almost all the work in this case. It is the phrase that made $56 million feel safe.

Collateral means: if the company fails, the property is yours. The property pays you back.

Here is what the receivership found. The properties Wells did acquire were heavily mortgaged. The income they generated was not enough to cover the promised twelve percent, much less the ninety-nine percent at year three. The collateral, in any meaningful sense, was not there. The receiver, Andrés Rivero, was appointed in August 2024 to manage Wells and twenty-three affiliated entities. Twenty-three. That is the number of legal containers built around the central pot of money. A reader does not need to know what each entity did. A reader needs to know that twenty-three is the number you build when you want a regulator's eyes to lose focus.

Marlene did not know about the twenty-three entities. She knew about one company and one note and one number, twelve percent, and one phrase, collateralized by real estate.

The note was the lock. The note was also the key.

IV.

The sales agents are the part that settled this week.

On June 24, 2026, the SEC announced a proposed settlement with Margaret Sanders and her firm, Sanders Family Office LLC. According to the SEC, Sanders and her firm raised approximately $40 million of the $56 million total, from about 600 of the 660 investors, and collected nearly $3 million in commissions. Under the proposed settlement, Sanders agreed to forfeit about $3 million in commissions, pay approximately $500,000 in interest, and accept a $100,000 civil penalty. Another sales agent, Francisco J. Herrera, is also named in the SEC's allegations.

Sales agents in a securities offering are supposed to be registered broker-dealers, or supervised by one. The SEC alleges these were not. They were people earning commissions on the sale of securities without the license that requires them to know what they are selling.

Here is the math that wounds.

$3 million in commissions paid to Sanders. $6.9 million in total undisclosed commissions across all agents. That is more than half of what Wells actually spent on real estate. The people who introduced the investors to the machine were paid, in aggregate, two-thirds of what the machine bought in buildings.

Read that again.

The commissions on the lie were almost the same size as the truth.

V.

The criminal cases closed first.

Bingham pleaded guilty in February 2026 to conspiracy to commit wire fraud. She was sentenced in May 2026 to four years in federal prison. Joseph pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit money laundering. On June 11, 2026, he was sentenced to twenty years.

The sentences land where they land. Four years and twenty years are numbers a federal judge writes on a page. They are not the same as recovery. The receiver has been working since August 2024 to claw back what is recoverable across the twenty-three entities, the trading accounts, the mortgaged properties, and the commissions. Some of it will come back. Most of it, in cases like this, does not.

Marlene received a notice from the receiver in late 2024. The notice explained the asset freeze. It explained that she was a creditor in a receivership and that her claim would be evaluated. It did not tell her how much she would get back. It does not, yet.

She still has the saxophone. Her grandson is fourteen now. He plays in his middle school band. She goes to the concerts. She sits in a folding chair in a school gymnasium and listens to him play, and the saxophone she bought with the first interest check is the only thing in the house that came out of Wells Real Estate Investment, LLC, with any value at all.

VI.

The machine in this case was not the trading account. The trading account was where the money went to die. The machine was the promissory note, the phrase collateralized by real estate, the $450 million portfolio number on the brochure, the navy blazer at the kitchen table, the friend from church, the husband nobody named, and the twenty-three entities behind the one company.

A real estate fund is a machine that turns rent into yield. This one was a machine that turned trust into commissions. The buildings were the wrapper. The note was the door.

Marlene signed at the kitchen table. The pen was the sales agent's pen.

The pen never belonged to her.

Evidence Trail
  1. SEC v. Wells Real Estate Investment, LLC, et al. | August 12, 2024 | SEC complaint, S.D. Fla.
  2. SEC Litigation Release | August 14, 2024 | Emergency asset freeze order
  3. U.S. Department of Justice | February 2026 | Janalie C. Bingham guilty plea, conspiracy to commit wire fraud
  4. U.S. Department of Justice | May 2026 | Bingham sentencing, four years federal prison
  5. U.S. Department of Justice | June 11, 2026 | Jean Joseph sentencing, 20 years federal prison, conspiracy to commit money laundering
  6. SEC press release | June 24, 2026 | Proposed settlement with Margaret Sanders and Sanders Family Office LLC
  7. Law360 | June 24, 2026 | "SEC Says Sales Agents Aided Fla. $56M Real Estate Fraud"
  8. Court-appointed receiver Andrés Rivero | August 2024 | Receivership over Wells and 23 affiliated entities
— Mark Tell, Editor

Editorial Notice

MarkTell is a true crime publication about financial fraud. Some scenes, dialogue, and sequential details are reconstructed from court filings, enforcement actions, news reports, and public records. Where the public record does not provide exact details, editorial reconstruction is used to convey the documented pattern of events. Names of private individuals may be changed to protect identity. All factual claims are sourced to public documents cited in the Evidence Trail above. MarkTell does not provide investment, legal, or financial advice. Nothing published here constitutes a recommendation to buy, sell, or avoid any investment. Allegations described in active cases have not been adjudicated and defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty. Readers should conduct their own due diligence before making financial decisions.