The foundation was humanitarian. The wire transfers were not.
A federal grand jury in Des Moines returned a sixteen-count indictment against two southeast Iowa men who allegedly ran a Ponzi scheme through a chain of "humanitarian foundations" that promised returns of 24 to 100 percent. The victims, prosecutors say, were friends and family.
Marlene was sixty-eight the morning she cashed the certificate of deposit.
She had kept that money at the credit union for eleven years. It paid what a credit union CD pays, which is not much, but it had paid it every quarter without fail, and Marlene liked things that did what they said they were going to do. She had spent thirty-one years cleaning teeth at a practice off Roosevelt Avenue in Burlington. She knew what steady looked like.
The man who came to see her that Tuesday morning she had known for close to twenty years. Their sons had played Little League together. He sat at her kitchen table with a mug of coffee and a single sheet of paper and told her about a foundation.
That was the word he used. Foundation.
The paper said the money would sit in an attorney's escrow account. It said the returns would be in the range of twenty-four percent, and on the better tranches, closer to a hundred. It said the strategies were bond trading and property flipping. It said the risk was low. On one line, in a phrase Marlene would remember later because she repeated it to her sister that night, it said the returns were tax-free.
She signed the papers on a Thursday. She wired the money on a Friday. The coffee in her cup had gone cold by the time she walked back from the bank.
I.
A federal grand jury in Des Moines returned a sixteen-count indictment in May 2026 against two southeast Iowa men. Chad Michael Boal of Burlington. Cory Duane Richards of West Burlington. The U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Iowa announced the indictment publicly on July 24, 2026.
Both men are charged with conspiracy to commit wire fraud. Boal is additionally charged with three counts of wire fraud and twelve counts of money laundering involving transactions of more than ten thousand dollars.
An indictment is an allegation. It is not a conviction. Both men are presumed innocent. A trial is scheduled to begin April 26, 2027.
The indictment describes conduct running from approximately May 2023 through at least June 2025. Prosecutors say the scheme involved dozens of victims and millions of dollars in losses. One source in the record puts the figure at tens of millions.
The victims, according to the U.S. Attorney's announcement, included longtime friends, family members, and clients.
Read that sentence again.
II.
Every Ponzi scheme has a pipe. The pipe is the story you tell about where the money goes. The better the story, the longer the pipe runs before somebody looks inside it.
The pipe in this case, according to the indictment, was a stack of entities the defendants called foundations. Not corporations. Not funds. Foundations. Golden Bar Foundation. F8511 Foundation, which appears in some records as R8511. New Life 314 Foundation. True North Foundation. Silver Bar Foundation.
The indictment refers to these entities as "unincorporated organized self-supporting humanitarian foundations." That phrase is doing a lot of work. Every word in it is doing something.
Unincorporated means there is no state filing to check. No secretary of state entry, no registered agent, no articles of incorporation you can pull up on a Tuesday to see when the entity was formed and by whom. Organized is the word that makes it sound like there is a structure. Self-supporting is the word that makes it sound like it does not need your money to survive, which is the opposite of what a Ponzi needs from you. Humanitarian is the word that makes you feel good about signing.
Foundation is the word that makes you feel safe.
None of those words are securities law. None of them mean anything the SEC would recognize. They are furniture. They fill the room.
Marlene did not know any of this. She was not required to. The man across her kitchen table had known her son since he was nine. He drank her coffee. He said the word escrow, which is a real word that describes a real thing, which is money held by a neutral third party until certain conditions are met. He said the money would be in an attorney's escrow account, which sounded like the safest place money could be.
The indictment alleges the money was never invested at all.
III.
Where the money went, according to prosecutors, is where the money usually goes in these cases.
Some of it went to earlier investors. That is what makes a Ponzi a Ponzi. New money in the front, old money out the back, the difference between the two disappearing into whatever the operator wants to spend it on. As long as the front-end intake grows faster than the back-end withdrawal demand, the pipe holds. When intake slows, or a wave of investors asks for their money at the same time, the pipe fails.
The rest of it, prosecutors allege, went to the operators.
Multiple luxury vehicles. Farmland in Henry County, Iowa. Residential real estate in Burlington and West Burlington.
Picture the farmland. Picture the truck parked next to the farmhouse. Picture whose retirement paid for the tires.
The investigation was conducted by the Federal Bureau of Investigation, IRS Criminal Investigation, and the Iowa Insurance Division's Fraud Bureau. Three agencies. That is what it takes to walk a pipe like this backward from the purchases to the promises.
IV.
Marlene did not know the money was gone in June of 2025. She did not know in August. In September her quarterly statement arrived, and the number on it was slightly higher than the last one, which was how it was supposed to work. In October the man came to her kitchen for coffee and told her she should consider putting more in.
She said she would think about it. She did think about it. She almost did it.
What she did instead, in November, was ask for a small withdrawal. Twelve thousand dollars, because her furnace was making a noise and her nephew was getting married in Des Moines and she wanted to give him something that mattered.
The withdrawal took longer than she expected. The man explained about the escrow timeline. He explained about the bond settlement cycle. He explained about a tax filing that had to be resolved first. Each explanation was calm. Each explanation used a word Marlene half-recognized.
The check came. It cleared. The furnace got fixed.
That is how a Ponzi buys another six months. It pays the small withdrawal that would sink it if it did not.
V.
Marlene found out from a phone call in the summer of 2026.
Her sister had seen something on the news. Two men indicted. Foundations. Burlington. Marlene sat down at the kitchen table with the phone in her hand and did not say anything for a long time. Her sister asked twice if she was still there.
She was still there.
She was still at the same table where she had signed the papers.
If convicted, conspiracy to commit wire fraud and each wire fraud count carry a maximum of twenty years in federal prison. Each money laundering count carries up to ten. The math on the sentencing exposure is arithmetic. The math on what Marlene has left is different.
She has the house. She has her Social Security. She has a daughter in Cedar Rapids who has offered to help her figure out what comes next.
She does not have the eleven years of quarterly interest from the credit union CD. She does not have the CD. She does not have the friendship, because the man who sat at her table is now a name in a federal indictment, and even if the case does not end where the prosecutors say it will end, that chair at her table is not a chair she can offer him again.
VI.
The word humanitarian did the work. That is what is worth sitting with.
Not the returns. Not the escrow language. Not the promise of tax-free income that no legitimate investment adviser would ever put in writing to a retail investor in Iowa or anywhere else. Those were the mechanisms. Those were the levers.
The word that opened the door was the word that made Marlene feel like the money was going somewhere good.
The indictment alleges the money went to a truck.
The trial is set for April 26, 2027. Allegation is not adjudication. The record will develop in a federal courtroom in Des Moines, and the two men named in it will have the opportunity to defend themselves, as they are entitled to do.
But the pipe in this case has been named. And the pipe in the next case, under different foundation names in a different small town, will look almost exactly like this one.
The word will be different. The word will always be different.
The chair will be the same.
- U.S. Attorney's Office, Southern District of Iowa | July 24, 2026 | Public announcement of indictment against Chad Michael Boal and Cory Duane Richards
- Federal grand jury indictment, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Iowa | May 2026 | 16-count indictment (conspiracy to commit wire fraud, wire fraud, money laundering)
- WQAD News (Google News aggregation) | July 2026 | "2 southeast Iowa men indicted for alleged multi-million-dollar Ponzi scheme"
- Federal Bureau of Investigation, IRS Criminal Investigation, Iowa Insurance Division Fraud Bureau | Investigating agencies referenced in DOJ announcement
- Iowa Insurance Division | Financial fraud loss statistics, 2020-2024
Editorial Notice
MarkTell is a true crime publication about financial fraud. Some scenes, dialogue, and sequential details are reconstructed from court filings, enforcement actions, news reports, and public records. Where the public record does not provide exact details, editorial reconstruction is used to convey the documented pattern of events. Names of private individuals may be changed to protect identity. All factual claims are sourced to public documents cited in the Evidence Trail above. MarkTell does not provide investment, legal, or financial advice. Nothing published here constitutes a recommendation to buy, sell, or avoid any investment. Allegations described in active cases have not been adjudicated and defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty. Readers should conduct their own due diligence before making financial decisions.